Political Obligation and Civil Disobedience*. EDWARD A. STETTNER, Wellesley College. In a time of disagreement over the legitimacy of American govern-. Civil Disobedience and Political Obligation – Can the two coexist? How can we justify from a moral point of view an act of civil d.
The literature on Locke's theory of consent tends to about their political obligation. Locke on Political Obligation. John Kilcullen. Much has been written about Locke's Second Treatise', but still,. I believe, the book's main line of argument has .
When is civil disobedience morally justified? The term 'civil disobedience' was coined by Henry David Thoreau in his essay to describe his refusal to . that civil disobedience is never covert or secretive; it is only ever. Before considering whether civil disobedience can be justified, we must discuss its relevance Is it ever really OK to knowingly defy the law? In his essay, "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience," Thoreau said, "I think that we.
Theories of political obligation fall into five general sorts: consent, gratitude, fair play, association, and natural duty. Let's start with the first. Although the lines that separate one theory from justifications of political obligation nowadays.
In traditional works in the history of political theory, the concepts of legitimacy and authority are closely bound. Legitimacy refers to certain qualities a government. An additional question is whether legitimate political authority is understood to entail political obligations or not. Most people probably think it.
Jan 4, On the most widely accepted account of civil disobedience, famously defended by John Rawls (), civil disobedience is a public. Session 11 Rawls, “The Justification of Civil Disobedience”. What distinguishes civil disobedience from other ways of disobeying the law? And what, if anything.